Full disclosure: I work for Research in Motion (RIMM) and they generously provide me with a fully paid, wonderfully capable BlackBerry smartphone. That said, this proposal irritates me for several reasons:
- It's none of the Government's business. The Government has no place intruding on what amounts to a small, but certainly appreciated, employee benefit. What's next? Company-purchased coffee, T-shirts and mugs based on the percent used during non-business hours?
- It's too cumbersome. Can you imagine a F500 company parsing every employee's phone bill in order to determine the percentage of business vs personal calls? If companies must track every call made home like “Hi Honey, I'll stop and pick up some milk,” then this will make Sarbanes-Oxley look positively effortless. As it turns out, there's been a law in place since 1989 that requires workers who use company-paid phones for personal calls to count the value of those calls and pay federal income tax accordingly. But neither businesses nor workers have paid much attention to it for the very reason that it's simply too burdensome to bother.
- It's not worth it. Has the IRS estimated the potential tax revenue from this proposal? At the dawn of the cellphone industry, wireless minutes were a precious commodity. Today is another story. The cost per minute has dropped increasingly with time, with most wireless plans containing judicious amounts of night and weekend free minutes. In light of the trillions of dollars being added to the national debt, it's hard to see this tax moving the needle.
- It's counter-productive. Employee's with phones attached to their hips are working 24x7. If the Government is going to tax personal calls made during business hours, should workers be given credits for making work-related calls during non-business hours? After all, they're not supposed to be working. A tax like this will only make employees think twice - or be bitter at best – about tending to business during the “off hours” time.
I don't see that happening. The smartphone has become an indispensable productivity tool for businesses. Demand will likely remain whether it's a company-provided benefit or not. Let's just hope common sense prevails at the IRS as they ponder how to raise tax revenue during this recession.

Great first post, Bill, the Telecom Stud.
ReplyDeleteThe impact of this on small businesses could be even more onerous since they don't have the ability to amortize new policy creation across thousands of employees. I for one am not looking forward to it. In my recent post on Selling the Value (http://get-clarity.com/blog/), I discussed the generic issue here. The government has clearly done a poor job on this one and needs to either rethink the policy or show us all where there's value in it for us.
I agree with Rick Warp. Not gonna happen. 1) a mobile device connected to work is not a perk. 2) what will they do with companies that don't purchase for the employees, yet the employee expenses the full bill? 3) if they did do it, most companies would gross-up the benefit to the employee and cover the cost of the tax. 4) if they did do it, less employees at RIMM and Apple would be issued mobile devices for testing and validation.
ReplyDelete